Staples v. United States
| Staples v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Argued November 30, 1993 Decided May 23, 1994 | |
| Full case name | Harold E Staples III v. United States |
| Citations | 511 U.S. 600 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A conviction of possessing an unregistered machine gun requires mens rea in that the defendant knew the weapon was fully automatic. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter |
| Concurrence | Ginsburg (in judgment), joined by O'Connor |
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Blackmun |
| Laws applied | |
| National Firearms Act | |
Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994), was a case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that the crime of possessing an unregistered machine gun requires knowledge that the firearm is a machine gun under the National Firearms Act.