R v Constanza
| R v Constanza | |
|---|---|
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Full case name | R v Gaetano Constanza |
| Decided | 6 March 1997 |
| Citations | [1997] 2 Cr App R 492; The Times, March 31, 1997 |
| Cases cited | None |
| Legislation cited | Offences Against the Person Act 1861 s. 47 |
| Case history | |
| Prior action | Conviction in Luton Crown Court. Presided by HHJ Moss. (Unreported) |
| Subsequent action | None |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting |
|
| Keywords | |
| |
R v Constanza [1997] is an English case reaching the Court of Appeal and is well-known (amongst other cases) for establishing the legal precedent in English criminal law that assault could be committed by causing the victim to apprehend violence which was to take place some time in the not immediate future, that it is not necessary for the victim to see the potential perpetrator of the violence, and that it was for the prosecution to prove that fear was in the victim's mind, but how it got there is irrelevant.