Hall v. Hall
| Hall v. Hall | |
|---|---|
| Argued January 16, 2018 Decided March 27, 2018 | |
| Full case name | Elsa Hall, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethlyn Louise Hall and as Successor Trustee of the Ethlyn Louise Hall Family Trust, Petitioner v. Samuel Hall, et al. |
| Docket no. | 16-1150 |
| Citations | 584 U.S. ___ (more) 138 S. Ct. 1118; 200 L. Ed. 2d 399 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 679 F. App'x 142 (3d Cir. 2017); cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017). |
| Holding | |
| When one of several cases consolidated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) is finally decided, that decision confers upon the losing party the immediate right to appeal, regardless of whether any of the other consolidated cases remain pending. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Roberts, joined by unanimous |
Hall v. Hall, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that within consolidated cases under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), the losing party has the immediate right to appeal when one of the consolidated cases is finally decided, even if other cases remain pending.