Conjunction/disjunction duality

Logical connectives
NOT ${\displaystyle \neg A,-A,{\overline {A}},\sim A}$ AND ${\displaystyle A\land B,A\cdot B,AB,A\ \&\ B,A\ \&\&\ B}$ NAND ${\displaystyle A{\overline {\land }}B,A\uparrow B,A\mid B,{\overline {A\cdot B}}}$ OR ${\displaystyle A\lor B,A+B,A\mid B,A\parallel B}$ NOR ${\displaystyle A{\overline {\lor }}B,A\downarrow B,{\overline {A+B}}}$ XNOR ${\displaystyle A\odot B,{\overline {A{\overline {\lor }}B}}}$ └ equivalent ${\displaystyle A\equiv B,A\Leftrightarrow B,A\leftrightharpoons B}$ XOR ${\displaystyle A{\underline {\lor }}B,A\oplus B}$ └nonequivalent ${\displaystyle A\not \equiv B,A\not \Leftrightarrow B,A\nleftrightarrow B}$ implies ${\displaystyle A\Rightarrow B,A\supset B,A\rightarrow B}$ nonimplication (NIMPLY) ${\displaystyle A\not \Rightarrow B,A\not \supset B,A\nrightarrow B}$ converse ${\displaystyle A\Leftarrow B,A\subset B,A\leftarrow B}$ converse nonimplication ${\displaystyle A\not \Leftarrow B,A\not \subset B,A\nleftarrow B}$
Related concepts
Propositional calculus Predicate logic Boolean algebra Truth table Truth function Boolean function Functional completeness Scope (logic)
Applications
Digital logic Programming languages Mathematical logic Philosophy of logic
Category

In propositional logic and Boolean algebra, there is a duality between conjunction and disjunction, also called the duality principle. It is the most widely known example of duality in logic. The duality consists in these metalogical theorems:

• In classical propositional logic, the connectives for conjunction and disjunction can be defined in terms of each other, and consequently, only one of them needs to be taken as primitive.
• If ${\displaystyle \varphi ^{D}}$ is used as notation to designate the result of replacing every instance of conjunction with disjunction, and every instance of disjunction with conjunction (e.g. ${\displaystyle p\land q}$ with ${\displaystyle q\lor p}$, or vice-versa), in a given formula ${\displaystyle \varphi }$, and if ${\displaystyle {\overline {\varphi }}}$ is used as notation for replacing every sentence-letter in ${\displaystyle \varphi }$ with its negation (e.g., ${\displaystyle p}$ with ${\displaystyle \neg p}$), and if the symbol ${\displaystyle \models }$ is used for semantic consequence and ⟚ for semantical equivalence between logical formulas, then it is demonstrable that ${\displaystyle \varphi ^{D}}$ ⟚ ${\displaystyle \neg {\overline {\varphi }}}$, and also that ${\displaystyle \varphi \models \psi }$ if, and only if, ${\displaystyle \psi ^{D}\models \varphi ^{D}}$, and furthermore that if ${\displaystyle \varphi }$ ⟚ ${\displaystyle \psi }$ then ${\displaystyle \varphi ^{D}}$ ⟚ ${\displaystyle \psi ^{D}}$. (In this context, ${\displaystyle {\overline {\varphi }}^{D}}$ is called the dual of a formula ${\displaystyle \varphi }$.)